linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: s3c2410: resume the I2C controller earlier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W6OCzXOE9gz9qxGggiVeTHiveg7W-1hnF3_-OKy7RLKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:31:54 -0700
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: s3c2410: resume the I2C controller earlier

Wolfram,

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:56:54PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> From: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>
>>
>> When the wake-up is triggered by the PMIC RTC, the RTC driver is trying
>> to read the PMIC interrupt status over I2C and fails because the I2C
>> controller is not resumed yet.
>> Let's resume the I2C controller earlier in the _noirq phase
>> (as other hardwares are doing), so we can properly get the wake-up
>> condition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> Applied to for-current (because Tomasz said it fixes issues), thanks! If
> you think the exynos patch of the same style should also be in current,
> please let me know...

Thanks!  I don't think the exynos one needs to go into for-current.
for-next is enough.  :)

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/