[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3285FA2B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:28:52 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, 'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI
on ARM64
> Are there any objections against this series from the x86 and ia64 maintainers?
I'll believe the claim of no functional changes for ia64 ... so no objections from me.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists