[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140717095657.GC17877@ulmo>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:56:58 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, teg@...m.no,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Liqin Chen <liqin.linux@...il.com>, msalter@...hat.com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
knaack.h@....de, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com, jic23@...nel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Let several drivers depends on HAS_IOMEM for
'devm_ioremap_resource'
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:20:36AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
[...]
> score should set HAS_IOMEM and doesn't
> even have public compilers
This begs an interesting question. Should it be made a requirement to
have publicly available compilers for new architectures so that they can
at least be compile-tested? Preferably this would of course be in source
form so that there aren't any dependencies on the distribution.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists