linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: Let several drivers depends on HAS_IOMEM for 'devm_ioremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:28:28 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, teg@...m.no,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
	Liqin Chen <liqin.linux@...il.com>, msalter@...hat.com,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	knaack.h@....de, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com, jic23@...nel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Let several drivers depends on HAS_IOMEM for 'devm_ioremap_resource'

On Thursday 17 July 2014 11:26:57 Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 17.07.2014 11:20, schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > On Thursday 17 July 2014 09:27:58 Chen Gang wrote:
> >>                                          gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order);
> >>  extern void devm_free_pages(struct device *dev, unsigned long addr);
> >>  
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM
> >>  void __iomem *devm_ioremap_resource(struct device *dev, struct resource *res);
> >> +#elif defined(CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST)
> >> +static inline void __iomem *devm_ioremap_resource(struct device *dev,
> >> +                                               struct resource *res)
> >> +{
> >> +       pr_warn("no hardware io memory, only for COMPILE_TEST\n");
> >> +       return (__force void __iomem *)ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> >> +}
> >> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM || CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST */
> >>  
> >>  /* allows to add/remove a custom action to devres stack */
> > 
> > To be honest, I think it's a bad idea to introduce wrappers functions
> > that are only available when CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST is set.
> > 
> > COMPILE_TEST is a great tool in general, but it has its limits.
> > In particular, the case for !CONFIG_IOMEM is completely obscure
> > and we won't find any bugs by allowing more drivers to be built
> > in those configurations, but attempting to do it would cause
> > endless churn by changing each instance of 'depends on HAS_IOMEM'
> > to 'depends on HAS_IOMEM || COMPILE_TEST'.
> > 
> > Note that s390 no has gained support for IOMEM, tile has it most
> > of the time (when PCI is enabled, so you get it in half the
> > test builds already), score should set HAS_IOMEM and doesn't
> > even have public compilers, and uml doesn't even compile in
> > latest mainline. Nothing else ever sets NO_IOMEM.
> 
> Huh? UML (v3.16-rc5-143-gb6603fe) builds fine here. What build issue are you facing?

This is what I got upon trying earlier. I have not attempted to look into
why this is happening. Note this is on linux-next from yesterday,
not mainline as I incorrectly stated above.

In file included from ../arch/um/include/asm/fixmap.h:58:0,
                 from ../arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h:11,
                 from ../include/linux/mm.h:51,
                 from ../kernel/uid16.c:6:
../include/asm-generic/fixmap.h: In function 'fix_to_virt':
../include/asm-generic/fixmap.h:31:2: error: size of unnamed array is negative
  BUILD_BUG_ON(idx >= __end_of_fixed_addresses);


	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/