[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140717114718.3895d851@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:47:18 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 16
Hi Nick,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:16:16 -0400 Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:45:25 -0400 Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Status of my local build tests will be at
> >> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next .
> >
> >> I am trying to get the maintainers to clean up still failing builds.
> >> When you get time I wondering
> >> if you can send me a list of still failing builds and warnings of
> >> interest in the kernel that is'
> >> up to date for me to help clean up these outstanding issues with the
> >> maintainers support as needed.
> >
> > See above ...
>
> There seems to be a few that are still succeeding for me that aren't for.
> Would you mind testing some of them again to see if they are succeeding
> with a gcc compiler that is newer then version 4.7.
Please tell us exactly what you are testing: what kernel version, what
compiler/binutils version. The kernel is meant to be able to be built
with gcc 4.7 (and some earlier) - barring compiler bugs, of course.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists