lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:01:35 -0400
From:	Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 16

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:16:16 -0400 Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:45:25 -0400 Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Status of my local build tests will be at
>> >> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next .
>> >
>> >> I am trying to get the maintainers to clean up still failing builds.
>> >> When you get time I wondering
>> >> if you can send me a list  of still failing builds and warnings of
>> >> interest in the kernel that is'
>> >> up to date for me to help clean up these outstanding issues with the
>> >> maintainers support as needed.
>> >
>> > See above ...
>>
>> There seems to be a few that are still succeeding for me that aren't for.
>> Would you mind testing some of them again to see if they are succeeding
>> with a gcc compiler that is newer then version 4.7.
>
> Please tell us exactly what you are testing: what kernel version, what
> compiler/binutils version.  The kernel is meant to be able to be built
> with gcc 4.7 (and some earlier) - barring compiler bugs, of course.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Absolutely , I am using the latest kernel rc from git. I am using gcc
4.8.3 and binutils 2.83.91.
In addition I am using  the default configurations as you are in less
I am doing it differently.
By the way xtensa-defconfig seems to fail because of binutils as I
discussed this with
the maintainers and they seemed to have tested it with a newer upstream binutils
then I am using and it succeeded it the linking failures I am seeing with it.
Cheers Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists