linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:14:57 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 16

Hi Nick,

On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:01:35 -0400 Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Absolutely , I am using the latest kernel rc from git. I am using gcc
> 4.8.3 and binutils 2.83.91.

Then that has nothing to do with me ... I am the linux-next
maintainer.  I just happen to use the same build test system as is also
used to test Linus' tree (kisskb).  I hope you are looking at the right
result pages for what you are testing.  The URL I gave you was for the
linux-next builds, not Linus' tree.

> In addition I am using  the default configurations as you are in less
> I am doing it differently.
> By the way xtensa-defconfig seems to fail because of binutils as I
> discussed this with
> the maintainers and they seemed to have tested it with a newer upstream binutils
> then I am using and it succeeded it the linking failures I am seeing with it.

Maybe we need per architecture minimum tools versions (instead of
current global one).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)