linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] Fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402958BAC6DC@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:51:06 +0000
From:	"Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com>
To:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"James Bottomley" <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	"michaelc@...wisc.edu" <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	"Christoph Hellwig (hch@...radead.org)" <hch@...radead.org>
CC:	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ohering@...e.com" <ohering@...e.com>,
	"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
	"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] Fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH_TIMEOUT from
 the basic I/O timeout

In sd_sync_cache:
	rq->timeout *= SD_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER;

Regardless of the baseline for the multiplication, a magic 
number of 2 is too arbitrary.  That might work for an
individual drive, but could be far too short for a RAID
controller that runs into worst case error handling for
the drives to which it is flushing (e.g., if its cache
is volatile and the drives all have recoverable errors
during writes).  That time goes up with a bigger cache and 
with more fragmented write data in the cache requiring
more individual WRITE commands.

A better value would be the Recommended Command Timeout field 
value reported in the REPORT SUPPORTED OPERATION CODES command,
if reported by the device server.  That is supposed to account
for the worst case.

For cases where that is not reported, exposing the multiplier
in sysfs would let the timeout for simple devices be set to
smaller values than complex devices.

Also, in both sd_setup_flush_cmnd and sd_sync_cache:
      cmd->cmnd[0] = SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE;
      cmd->cmd_len = 10;

SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) should be favored over SYNCHRONIZE 
CACHE (10) unless SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (10) is not supported.

---
Rob Elliott    HP Server Storage

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/