linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] arm: add basic support for Mediatek MT6589 boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:47:53 +0200
From:	Heiko Stübner <heiko.stuebner@...com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	rdunlap@...radead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk, tglx@...utronix.de,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
	florian.vaussard@...l.ch, jic23@...nel.org, jason@...edaemon.net,
	andrew@...n.ch, silvio.fricke@...il.com, olof@...om.net,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
	gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, arnd@...db.de,
	robherring2@...il.com, marc.zyngier@....com,
	maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, soren.brinkmann@...inx.com,
	shawn.guo@...escale.com, anders.berg@....com,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, fabf@...net.be, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] arm: add basic support for Mediatek MT6589 boards

Hi Daniel,

Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 11:46:51 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> On 07/07/2014 05:13 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > This adds a generic devicetree board file and a dtsi for boards
> > based on MT6589 SoCs from Mediatek.
> > 
> > Apart from the generic parts (gic, clocks) the only component
> > currently supported are the timers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> > --
> 
> I will take this patchset through my tree but this patch touches an area
> I am not handling.
> 
> Olof, Arnd, do you mind to ack this patch ?

wouldn't it be easier to just take patches 1,2,3,4 through your tree and let 
patches 5,6,7 go through arm-soc?

There is no compile-time dependency between the two parts, so they will come 
together nicely in linux-next and during the merge-window.


Also in [0] Olof wrote:

----------
Traditionally we usually take the DT changes through arm-soc, but as
long as we share the branch we might be ok. We tend to stick them in
different branches in our tree though, so rockchip will be a little
mis-sorted this release. Not a big deal, and we can deal with it.
-----------

So I'd assume splitting the patchset this way might be a nice solution?


Heiko


[0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg347053.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/