linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] arm: add basic support for Mediatek MT6589 boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:56:07 +0200
From:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:	Heiko Stübner <heiko.stuebner@...com>
CC:	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	rdunlap@...radead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk, tglx@...utronix.de,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
	florian.vaussard@...l.ch, jic23@...nel.org, jason@...edaemon.net,
	andrew@...n.ch, silvio.fricke@...il.com, olof@...om.net,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
	gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, arnd@...db.de,
	robherring2@...il.com, marc.zyngier@....com,
	maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, soren.brinkmann@...inx.com,
	shawn.guo@...escale.com, anders.berg@....com,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, fabf@...net.be, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] arm: add basic support for Mediatek MT6589 boards

On 07/18/2014 12:47 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 11:46:51 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> On 07/07/2014 05:13 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>> This adds a generic devicetree board file and a dtsi for boards
>>> based on MT6589 SoCs from Mediatek.
>>>
>>> Apart from the generic parts (gic, clocks) the only component
>>> currently supported are the timers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>>> --
>>
>> I will take this patchset through my tree but this patch touches an area
>> I am not handling.
>>
>> Olof, Arnd, do you mind to ack this patch ?
>
> wouldn't it be easier to just take patches 1,2,3,4 through your tree and let
> patches 5,6,7 go through arm-soc?
>
> There is no compile-time dependency between the two parts, so they will come
> together nicely in linux-next and during the merge-window.
>
>
> Also in [0] Olof wrote:
>
> ----------
> Traditionally we usually take the DT changes through arm-soc, but as
> long as we share the branch we might be ok. We tend to stick them in
> different branches in our tree though, so rockchip will be a little
> mis-sorted this release. Not a big deal, and we can deal with it.
> -----------
>
> So I'd assume splitting the patchset this way might be a nice solution?
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
> [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg347053.html

Indeed.

Olof, Arnd ? Will you take the patches 5-6-7 ?



-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/