[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140718124038.GE24496@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 08:40:38 -0400
From: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch V1 21/30] mm, irqchip: Use
cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem_id() to support memoryless node
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:38PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> When CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is enabled, cpu_to_node()/numa_node_id()
> may return a node without memory, and later cause system failure/panic
> when calling kmalloc_node() and friends with returned node id.
> So use cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem_id() instead to get the nearest node with
> memory for the/current cpu.
>
> If CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is disabled, cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem_id()
> is the same as cpu_to_node()/numa_node_id().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-clps711x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Do you have anything depending on this? Can apply it to irqchip? If
you need to keep it with other changes,
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
But please do let me know if I can take it.
thx,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists