[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140721171527.GA4156@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:15:27 -0700
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roman Gushchin <klamm@...dex-team.ru>,
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch V1 01/30] mm, kernel: Use cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem_id()
to support memoryless node
Hi Paul,
On 11.07.2014 [08:14:05 -0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:18PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > When CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is enabled, cpu_to_node()/numa_node_id()
> > may return a node without memory, and later cause system failure/panic
> > when calling kmalloc_node() and friends with returned node id.
> > So use cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem_id() instead to get the nearest node with
> > memory for the/current cpu.
> >
> > If CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is disabled, cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem_id()
> > is the same as cpu_to_node()/numa_node_id().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
>
> For the rcutorture piece:
>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Or if you separate the kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c portion into a separate
> patch, I will queue it separately.
Just FYI, based upon a separate discussion with Tejun and others, it
seems to be preferred to avoid the proliferation of cpu_to_mem
throughout the kernel blindly. For kthread_create_on_node(), I'm going
to try and fix the underlying issue and so you, as the caller, should
still specify the NUMA node you are running the kthread on
(cpu_to_node), not where you expect the memory to come from
(cpu_to_mem).
Thanks,
Nish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists