[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C9B862.5050106@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:14:26 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: Avoid corrupting hrtimer tree during suspend
On 07/18/2014 04:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/18/14 15:42, John Stultz wrote:
>> If its a regression (and needs -stable backports) it needs to go in via
>> tip/timers/urgent, and not via the regular merge window.
>>
>> Whats the additional risk -stable wise for canceling the timer during
>> suspend and starting it back up during resume?
>>
> I'd say close to zero given that we'd only be making the timer run a
> little bit later and we have slack in there already. Here's that version.
Ok, thanks. I'll try to do a closer review it and get it queued. Is
there anyone who might be able to validate this and provide a Tested-by: ?
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists