[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53CEE3D6.6070207@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:21:10 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: Avoid corrupting hrtimer tree during suspend
On 07/18/14 17:14, John Stultz wrote:
> On 07/18/2014 04:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 07/18/14 15:42, John Stultz wrote:
>>> If its a regression (and needs -stable backports) it needs to go in via
>>> tip/timers/urgent, and not via the regular merge window.
>>>
>>> Whats the additional risk -stable wise for canceling the timer during
>>> suspend and starting it back up during resume?
>>>
>> I'd say close to zero given that we'd only be making the timer run a
>> little bit later and we have slack in there already. Here's that version.
> Ok, thanks. I'll try to do a closer review it and get it queued. Is
> there anyone who might be able to validate this and provide a Tested-by: ?
>
Maybe someone from Linaro can give a Tested-by? I basically did this:
# grep -A1 'sched_clock' /proc/timer_list && echo mem > /sys/power/state && grep -A1 'sched_clock' /proc/timer_list
and made sure that the expires time was reset.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists