linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] ARM: berlin: add AHCI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53CA346B.1050802@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:03:39 +0200
From:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Antoine Ténart 
	<antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	kishon@...com, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
	jszhang@...vell.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] ARM: berlin: add AHCI support

On 07/18/2014 03:57 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
>> In both cases we do not have time to do this for the next release, as
>> the request popped up quite late.
>>
>> So as of now:
>>   - Either the series is merged as is and changes to the AHCI framework
>>     can be made for 3.18, as it's not particularly linked to this
>>     series.
>>   - Or you really do not want it. Then that would be great if patches
>>     1-2 and 7-8 could be merged so that we do not end up with this big
>>     series going for yet another cycle... I think Kishon already took
>>     patches 1-2.
> 
> I don't wanna take in code which isn't in the shape that it should be.
> Things like this accumulate to become a large maintenance burden over
> time.  Sure, urgent things can slip in and then later be fixed up but
> who are gonna do that here?  You guys already seem to be under time
> pressure as it is.
> 
> If you guys can figure something out with Hans regarding how to
> proceed on this, I'll be happy take the code as is.

I cannot say much about AHCI, but if the PHY driver is fine I can
take the DT patches adding it to BG2Q and BG2Q-DMP at any time.

Sebastian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/