linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] asm-generic/io.h: Implement generic {read,write}s*()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4967546.K5Yf5hcJE1@wuerfel>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:05:33 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] asm-generic/io.h: Implement generic {read,write}s*()

On Saturday 19 July 2014 10:41:52 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > 
> > > This set:
> > > #define inb_p(addr)     inb(addr)
> > > #define inw_p(addr)     inw(addr)
> > > #define inl_p(addr)     inl(addr)
> > > #define outb_p(x, addr) outb((x), (addr))
> > > #define outw_p(x, addr) outw((x), (addr))
> > > #define outl_p(x, addr) outl((x), (addr))
> > > 
> > > Should have a comment that say they are deprecated.
> > > Especially the "b" variants still have many users.
> > 
> > Are they? I don't remember ever seeing a reason to deprecate
> > them. We could perhaps enclose them in #ifdef CONFIG_ISA, but
> > there may also be some drivers that use the same code for ISA
> > and PCI, and it doesn't really hurt on PCI.
> 
> It is my understanding that inl and inl_p are the same these days.
> A quick grep indicate that only m68k define the
> _p variant different from the other.
> But I failed to find and description of the difference between the
> two which is why I assumed they were identical and thus no need for both.

I don't know why m68k needs it, it's really an x86-specific
thing, see slow_down_io() in arch/x86/include/asm/io.h.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/