lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:10:25 +0200 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] asm-generic/io.h: Implement generic {read,write}s*() On Saturday 19 July 2014 10:53:38 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Then there are the other type where one IO access function > may re-use the implementation of another IO access function: > > #ifndef writeb > #define writeb __raw_writeb > #endif > > This could have been implmented like this: > > #ifndef writeb > #define writeb writeb > static inline void writeb(u8 b, volatile void __iomem *addr) > { > __raw_writeb(b, addr); > } > #endif > > In this way the prototype of the function is easy to understand and > we avoid the macro tricks were we blindly replace one function name, > with another function name. > And we also use the same pattarn all over for the various functions. > > Concerning the efficiency the compiler should be smart enough to > do the same independent on the two implmentations. I really don't have a strong opinion on those, as you say one is a little shorter and the other is a little more readable, so my preference in a case like this is to leave it up to the person who last touches the code and let them decide. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists