linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] of: Add Tegra124 EMC bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:28:43 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
	Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
CC:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] of: Add Tegra124 EMC bindings

On 07/11/2014 10:43 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com> wrote:
>> Add binding documentation for the nvidia,tegra124-emc device tree
>> node.
> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/tegra-emc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/tegra-emc.txt
> 
>> +Required properties :
>> +- compatible : "nvidia,tegra124-emc".
>> +- reg : Should contain 1 or 2 entries:
>> +  - EMC register set
>> +  - MC register set : Required only if no node with
>> +    'compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-mc"' exists. The MC register set
>> +    is first read from the MC node. If it doesn't exist, it is read
>> +    from this property.
>> +- timings : Should contain 1 entry for each supported clock rate.
>> +  Entries should be named "timing@n" where n is a 0-based increasing
>> +  number. The timings must be listed in rate-ascending order.
> 
> There are upcoming boards which support multiple DRAM configurations
> and require a separate set of timings for each configuration.  Could
> we instead have multiple sets of timings with the proper one selected
> at runtime by RAM code, as reported by PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_0?
> Something like:
> 
> emc {
>         emc-table@0 {
>                 nvidia,ram-code = <0>;
>                 timing@0 {
>                         ...
>                 };
>                 ...
>         };

Until recently, there was a binding for Tegra20 EMC in mainline. We
should make sure the Tegra124 driver (or rather binding...) is at least
as feature-ful as that was.

Furthermore, I thought that with some boards, there were more RAM
options that there were available RAM code strap bits. I assume that in
mainline, we'll simply have different base DT files for the different
sets of configurations? Or, will we want to add another level to the DT
to represent different sets of RAM code values? I'm not sure what data
source the bootloader uses to determine which set of RAM configuration
to use when there aren't enough entries in the BCT for the boot ROM to
do this automatically, and whether we have any way to get that value
into the kernel, so it could use it for the extra DT level lookup?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/