linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] ARM: tegra: Remove TEGRA124_CLK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53CD9620.3090301@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:37:20 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>, pdeschrijver@...dia.com,
	pgaikwad@...dia.com, mturquette@...aro.org,
	thierry.reding@...il.com
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ARM: tegra: Remove TEGRA124_CLK_EMC from tegra124-car.h

On 07/11/2014 08:18 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> Remove the TEGRA124_CLK_EMC cell value define for tegra124-car
> from the binding headers. This clock has never been able to do
> anything and is being replaced with a separate EMC driver with
> its own device tree node. Removing the define ensures that any
> user will not mistakenly refer to <&tegra_car TEGRA124_CLK_EMC>
> instead of <&emc> or similar.

If the clock physically exists in HW, I see no reason to remove it from
the binding definition, even if we don't implement it (or remove the
implementation of it) in the Linux clock driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/