[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1466357.PZLf9xnT2g@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:40:34 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/NVS: Not save NVS region for new machines to accelerate S3
On Friday, July 18, 2014 01:55:22 PM Lan Tianyu wrote:
> NVS region is saved and restored unconditionally for machines without
> nvs_nosave quirk during S3. Tested some new machines and the operation
> is not necessary. Saving NVS region also affects S2RAM speed. The time of
> NVS saving and restoring depends on the size of NVS region and it consumes
> 7~10ms normally.
>
> This patch is to make machines produced from 2012 to now not saving NVS region
> to accelerate S3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> index b3e3cc7..896d8be 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,12 @@ static struct dmi_system_id acpisleep_dmi_table[] __initdata = {
>
> static void acpi_sleep_dmi_check(void)
> {
> + int year;
> +
> dmi_check_system(acpisleep_dmi_table);
> +
> + if (dmi_get_date(DMI_BIOS_DATE, &year, NULL, NULL) && year >= 2012)
> + acpi_nvs_nosave_s3();
I'd prefer the ordering here to be different so that individual quirks
could be used to change the date-based wholesale behavior.
> }
>
> /**
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists