linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2 V2] workqueue: remove the argument @wakeup from worker_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1406005330-11864-2-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:02:00 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2 V2] workqueue: remove the argument @wakeup from worker_set_flags()

worker_set_flags() doesn't necessarily wake next worker and the @wakeup
can be removed, the caller can use the following conbination instead
when needed:

	worker_set_flags();
	if (need_more_worker(pool))
 		wake_up_worker(pool);

It reduces the machine-code and footprint for the process_one_work()
if worker_set_flags() is really inlined.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   27 ++++++++-------------------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index cd75689..40b1f00 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -867,35 +867,22 @@ struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
  * worker_set_flags - set worker flags and adjust nr_running accordingly
  * @worker: self
  * @flags: flags to set
- * @wakeup: wakeup an idle worker if necessary
  *
- * Set @flags in @worker->flags and adjust nr_running accordingly.  If
- * nr_running becomes zero and @wakeup is %true, an idle worker is
- * woken up.
+ * Set @flags in @worker->flags and adjust nr_running accordingly.
  *
  * CONTEXT:
  * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock)
  */
-static inline void worker_set_flags(struct worker *worker, unsigned int flags,
-				    bool wakeup)
+static inline void worker_set_flags(struct worker *worker, unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(worker->task != current);
 
-	/*
-	 * If transitioning into NOT_RUNNING, adjust nr_running and
-	 * wake up an idle worker as necessary if requested by
-	 * @wakeup.
-	 */
+	/* If transitioning into NOT_RUNNING, adjust nr_running. */
 	if ((flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING) &&
 	    !(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING)) {
-		if (wakeup) {
-			if (atomic_dec_and_test(&pool->nr_running) &&
-			    !list_empty(&pool->worklist))
-				wake_up_worker(pool);
-		} else
-			atomic_dec(&pool->nr_running);
+		atomic_dec(&pool->nr_running);
 	}
 
 	worker->flags |= flags;
@@ -2043,9 +2030,11 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
 	/*
 	 * CPU intensive works don't participate in concurrency
 	 * management.  They're the scheduler's responsibility.
+	 * Another worker should be woken up after WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE
+	 * is set, see next code.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(cpu_intensive))
-		worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE, true);
+		worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE);
 
 	/*
 	 * Wake up another worker if necessary.  It is a no-op
@@ -2210,7 +2199,7 @@ recheck:
 		}
 	} while (keep_working(pool));
 
-	worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP, false);
+	worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP);
 sleep:
 	/*
 	 * pool->lock is held and there's no work to process and no need to
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/