lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1406016591.23999.40.camel@marge.simpson.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:09:51 +0200 From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> To: Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> Cc: drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, drbd-user@...ts.linbit.com, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: drbd_worker.c: Remove lines On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 02:17 -0400, Nick Krause wrote: > There seems to be two fix mes in function in wait_for_work. I was > wondering can we remove these spinlocks? Rather than ask someone else this question, take a look to see what the lock protects and from whom. If protected thingy cannot possibly be diddled concurrently, you'll know what to do, if it can be, you'll know what to do. If you can't figure it out, move on to the next windmill until the last one on the planet has been tilted or bounced off of :) -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists