linux-kernel - Re: drbd_worker.c: Remove lines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDOMViu2y1g2b6MXPSqh6_hbFjzo4BRmc39kLBjeF9ecwWN+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:43:55 -0400
From:	Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc:	drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, drbd-user@...ts.linbit.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: drbd_worker.c: Remove lines

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Mike Galbraith
<umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 02:17 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
>> There seems to be two fix mes in function in wait_for_work. I was
>> wondering can we remove these spinlocks?
>
> Rather than ask someone else this question, take a look to see what the
> lock protects and from whom.  If protected thingy cannot possibly be
> diddled concurrently, you'll know what to do, if it can be, you'll know
> what to do.  If you can't figure it out, move on to the next windmill
> until the last one on the planet has been tilted or bounced off of :)
>
> -Mike
>
Mike ,
Thanks for the advice.
Cheers Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/