lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140722164927.GA21479@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:49:27 -0400 From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Cc: jakob@...are.com Subject: vmwgfx: remove identical branches Commit 8b7de6aa8468: "vmwgfx: Rework fence event action" removed the tv_sec & tv_usec arguments to vmw_event_fence_action_create, which meant that both sides of the if/else are now exactly the same. Remove the flag check, and just do it unconditionally. Spotted with Coverity. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c index 436b013b4231..a078e6bbaf0a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c @@ -1124,16 +1124,10 @@ int vmw_fence_event_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, BUG_ON(fence == NULL); - if (arg->flags & DRM_VMW_FE_FLAG_REQ_TIME) - ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence, - arg->flags, - arg->user_data, - true); - else - ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence, - arg->flags, - arg->user_data, - true); + ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence, + arg->flags, + arg->user_data, + true); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) { if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists