[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140722164927.GA21479@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:49:27 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: jakob@...are.com
Subject: vmwgfx: remove identical branches
Commit 8b7de6aa8468: "vmwgfx: Rework fence event action" removed the
tv_sec & tv_usec arguments to vmw_event_fence_action_create, which meant
that both sides of the if/else are now exactly the same.
Remove the flag check, and just do it unconditionally.
Spotted with Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
index 436b013b4231..a078e6bbaf0a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
@@ -1124,16 +1124,10 @@ int vmw_fence_event_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
BUG_ON(fence == NULL);
- if (arg->flags & DRM_VMW_FE_FLAG_REQ_TIME)
- ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence,
- arg->flags,
- arg->user_data,
- true);
- else
- ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence,
- arg->flags,
- arg->user_data,
- true);
+ ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence,
+ arg->flags,
+ arg->user_data,
+ true);
if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists