[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <272182693.34271636.1406066794514.JavaMail.root@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@...are.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: vmwgfx: remove identical branches
----- Original Message -----
> Commit 8b7de6aa8468: "vmwgfx: Rework fence event action" removed the
> tv_sec & tv_usec arguments to vmw_event_fence_action_create, which meant
> that both sides of the if/else are now exactly the same.
>
> Remove the flag check, and just do it unconditionally.
>
> Spotted with Coverity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@...are.com>
and thanks for the patch.
Cheers, Jakob.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
> index 436b013b4231..a078e6bbaf0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
> @@ -1124,16 +1124,10 @@ int vmw_fence_event_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> void *data,
>
> BUG_ON(fence == NULL);
>
> - if (arg->flags & DRM_VMW_FE_FLAG_REQ_TIME)
> - ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence,
> - arg->flags,
> - arg->user_data,
> - true);
> - else
> - ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence,
> - arg->flags,
> - arg->user_data,
> - true);
> + ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence,
> + arg->flags,
> + arg->user_data,
> + true);
>
> if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
> if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists