[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53CF66FC.1040604@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:40:44 +0200
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"m.chehab@...sung.com" <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, rric@...nel.org,
Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] APEI: Make APEI architecture independent.
Many thanks Tony! And thanks goes to Borislav and Robert too.
Regards,
Tomasz
On 22.07.2014 23:08, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Tomasz Nowicki
> <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org> wrote:
>> APEI is currently implemented so that it depends on x86 hardware.
>> The primary dependency is that GHES uses the x86 NMI for hardware
>> error notification and MCE for memory error handling. These patches
>> remove that dependency.
>>
>> Other APEI features such as error reporting via external IRQ, error
>> serialization, or error injection, do not require changes to use them
>> on non-x86 architectures.
>>
>> The following patch set eliminates the APEI Kconfig x86 dependency
>> by making these changes:
>> - treat NMI notification as GHES architecture - HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
>> - group and wrap around #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI code which
>> is used only for NMI path
>> - identify architectural boxes and abstract it accordingly (tlb flush and MCE)
>> - rework ioremap for both IRQ and NMI context
>>
>> NMI code is kept in ghes.c file since NMI and IRQ context are tightly coupled.
>>
>> Note, these patches introduce no functional changes for x86. The NMI notification
>> feature is hard selected for x86. Architectures that want to use this
>> feature should also provide NMI code infrastructure.
>
> Looks OK to me. I've thrown this series into a topic branch of the ras
> git tree named "apei". When I push it to kernel.org in a few minutes
> the build test robots will pounce and try all sorts of randconfig builds.
> They'll send you (and me) e-mails if they find any corner cases.
>
> -Tony
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists