linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: dra: dt-bindings: Fix pull enable/disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140723084657.GA22006@atomide.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:46:57 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc:	balbi@...com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: dra: dt-bindings: Fix pull enable/disable

* Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> [140722 11:34]:
> On 07/22/2014 11:47 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:39:54AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >> The DRA74/72 control module pins have a weak pull up and pull down.
> >> This is configured by bit offset 17. if BIT(17) is 1, a pull up is
> >> selected, else a pull down is selected.
> >>
> >> However, this pull resisstor is applied based on BIT(16) -
> >> PULLUDENABLE - if BIT(18) is *0*, then pull as defined in BIT(17) is
> >> applied, else no weak pulls are applied. We defined this in reverse.
> >>
> >> Reference: Table 18-5 (Description of the pad configuration register
> >> bits) in Technical Reference Manual Revision (DRA74x revision Q:
> >> SPRUHI2Q Revised June 2014 and DRA72x revision F: SPRUHP2F - Revised
> >> June 2014)
> >>
> >> Fixes: 6e58b8f1daaf1a ("ARM: dts: DRA7: Add the dts files for dra7 SoC and dra7-evm board")
> >> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Tested on an upcoming board.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> > 
> > 
> Felipe,
> Thanks.
> 
> Tony,
> 
> If you could consider this for the rc cycle it might be great(as well
> as for stable). The pull direction error can cause all kinds of
> Pull-down Vs Pull-Up contention with severe risk for certain IP
> reliability.

Yes this is a good one for the -rc cycle, applying into
omap-for-v3.16/fixes.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/