lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwQfwfAP6U77_nD_mSvoygj=cZ09N644hKRtzgLnEqhZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:55:42 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Random panic in load_balance() with 3.16-rc

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> OK, that leaves us agreeing we want to clean that up, but still no
> closer to explaining WTH happened on Michel's machine. Weird that.

So looking at that destination pointer value (ffff10043c803e8c), it
*looks* like a pointer. Almost. If it was 0xffff80.. instead of
0xffff10.. it would probably be a fine pointer.

Can you send me the config? I'm wondering what else might be close to
that load_balance_mask percpu allocation, that migth perhaps have
overflowed and written a stray byte into the pointer or something?

                  Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ