[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53D005D6.8050302@bjorling.me>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:58:30 +0200
From: Matias Bjorling <m@...rling.me>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: willy@...ux.intel.com, keith.busch@...el.com, sbradshaw@...ron.com,
axboe@...com, tom.leiming@...il.com, rlnelson@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] NVMe: Convert to blk-mq
On 07/14/2014 02:41 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +static int nvme_init_hctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, void *data,
>> + unsigned int hctx_idx)
>> + struct nvme_queue *nvmeq = dev->queues[
>> + (hctx_idx % dev->queue_count) + 1];
>> +
>> + /* nvmeq queues are shared between namespaces. We assume here that
>> + * blk-mq map the tags so they match up with the nvme queue tags */
>> + if (!nvmeq->hctx)
>> + nvmeq->hctx = hctx;
>> + else
>> + WARN_ON(nvmeq->hctx->tags != hctx->tags);
>
>
> This wrong to me, as you're overwriting the value of nvmeq->hctx for each
> new requeust_queue. But nothing but ->tagsis ever used from nvmeq->hctx,
> so you shold rather set up nvmeq->tags in nvme_dev_add.
Ack
>
>> +static int nvme_init_request(void *data, struct request *req,
>> + unsigned int hctx_idx, unsigned int rq_idx,
>> + unsigned int numa_node)
>> +{
>> + struct nvme_dev *dev = data;
>> + struct nvme_cmd_info *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>> + struct nvme_queue *nvmeq = dev->queues[hctx_idx + 1];
>> +
>> + WARN_ON(!nvmeq);
>> + cmd->nvmeq = nvmeq;
>
> Shouldn't this fail instead of the warn_on?
Yes, ack
>
>> +static int nvme_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req)
>> {
>> + struct nvme_ns *ns = hctx->queue->queuedata;
>> + struct nvme_queue *nvmeq = hctx->driver_data;
>> + struct nvme_cmd_info *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>> struct nvme_iod *iod;
>> + enum dma_data_direction dma_dir;
>> + int psegs = req->nr_phys_segments;
>> + int result = BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY;
>> + /*
>> + * Requeued IO has already been prepped
>> + */
>> + iod = req->special;
>> + if (iod)
>> + goto submit_iod;
>>
>> + iod = nvme_alloc_iod(psegs, blk_rq_bytes(req), GFP_ATOMIC);
>> if (!iod)
>> + return result;
>
> So there's still a memory allocation for each request here. Any reason
> this can't be preallocated at least for reasonable sized I/O?
Not at all. I've kept from adding optimizations in the first pass. The
patches following can implement the optimizations. Jens already has a
patch for this in his tree. It also removes GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> No need for GFP_ATOMIC here either, and you probably need a mempool to
> guarantee forward progress.
>
>> + if (req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
>> void *range;
>> /*
>> * We reuse the small pool to allocate the 16-byte range here
>> @@ -752,33 +602,53 @@ static int nvme_submit_bio_queue(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, struct nvme_ns *ns,
>> range = dma_pool_alloc(nvmeq->dev->prp_small_pool,
>> GFP_ATOMIC,
>> &iod->first_dma);
>> + if (!range)
>> + goto finish_cmd;
>> iod_list(iod)[0] = (__le64 *)range;
>> iod->npages = 0;
>> } else if (psegs) {
>> + dma_dir = rq_data_dir(req) ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
>> +
>> + sg_init_table(iod->sg, psegs);
>> + iod->nents = blk_rq_map_sg(req->q, req, iod->sg);
>> + if (!iod->nents) {
>> + result = BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_ERROR;
>> + goto finish_cmd;
>> }
>> +
>> + if (!dma_map_sg(nvmeq->q_dmadev, iod->sg, iod->nents, dma_dir))
>> + goto finish_cmd;
>> +
>> + if (blk_rq_bytes(req) != nvme_setup_prps(nvmeq->dev, iod,
>> + blk_rq_bytes(req), GFP_ATOMIC))
>> + goto finish_cmd;
>> + }
>
> Would be nice to factor these two into helpers, that could also avoid
> the submid_iod goto..
Agree. The q_suspended properly isn't necessary any more, I'll like to
wait with this until its gone upstream, to keep the patch flow simple.
>
>> +
>> + if (req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
>> + nvme_submit_discard(nvmeq, ns, req, iod);
>> + goto queued;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) {
>> + nvme_submit_flush(nvmeq, ns, req->tag);
>> + goto queued;
>> }
>> - return 0;
>>
>> + nvme_submit_iod(nvmeq, iod, ns);
>> + queued:
>
> A simple
>
> if (req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD)
> nvme_submit_discard(nvmeq, ns, req, iod);
> else if if (req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH)
> nvme_submit_flush(nvmeq, ns, req->tag);
> else
> nvme_submit_iod(nvmeq, iod, ns);
>
> seems preferable here.
Ack
>
>> +static void nvme_cancel_queue_ios(void *data, unsigned long *tag_map)
>> {
>> + struct nvme_queue *nvmeq = data;
>> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = nvmeq->hctx;
>> + unsigned int tag = 0;
>>
>> + tag = 0;
>> + do {
>> + struct request *req;
>> void *ctx;
>> nvme_completion_fn fn;
>> + struct nvme_cmd_info *cmd;
>> static struct nvme_completion cqe = {
>> .status = cpu_to_le16(NVME_SC_ABORT_REQ << 1),
>> };
>> + int qdepth = nvmeq == nvmeq->dev->queues[0] ?
>> + nvmeq->dev->admin_tagset.queue_depth :
>> + nvmeq->dev->tagset.queue_depth;
>>
>> + /* zero'd bits are free tags */
>> + tag = find_next_zero_bit(tag_map, qdepth, tag);
>> + if (tag >= qdepth)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(hctx->tags, tag++);
>> + cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>
> Seems like blk-mq would make your life easier by exporting an iterator
> that goes over each in-use request instead of the current
> blk_mq_tag_busy_iter prototype. blk_mq_timeout_check would also be able
> to make use of that, so maybe that would be a good preparatory patch?
Yes. I'll prepare a patch and send it off to Jens.
>
>> +static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct request *req)
>> {
>> + struct nvme_cmd_info *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>> + struct nvme_queue *nvmeq = cmd->nvmeq;
>>
>> + dev_warn(nvmeq->q_dmadev, "Timeout I/O %d QID %d\n", req->tag,
>> + nvmeq->qid);
>> + if (nvmeq->dev->initialized)
>> + nvme_abort_req(req);
>>
>> + return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
>> +}
>
> Aborting a request but then resetting the timer looks wrong to me.
>
> If that's indeed the intended behavior please add a comment explaining
> it.
Ack
>
>> +
>> +static int nvme_alloc_admin_tags(struct nvme_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + if (!dev->admin_q) {
>
> When would it be non-NULL? Seems like the resume case might be the
> case, but I suspect the code could be restructured to avoid even calling
> nvme_alloc_admin_tags for that case.
Ack. I want to wait changing resume/suspend flow until its gone
upstream. It should go into a separate patch.
>
>> +static void nvme_free_admin_tags(struct nvme_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + if (dev->admin_q)
>> + blk_mq_free_tag_set(&dev->admin_tagset);
>> +}
>
> When would this be called with the admin queue not initialized?
Is it possible for a pci_driver->remove fn to be called during the probe
phase? If not, then this could definitely be removed.
>
>> +static void nvme_dev_remove_admin(struct nvme_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + if (dev->admin_q && !blk_queue_dying(dev->admin_q))
>> + blk_cleanup_queue(dev->admin_q);
>> +}
>
> Same here.
>
Thanks for taking the time to look through it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists