[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140728085337.GM6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:53:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, acme@...radead.org,
eranian@...gle.com, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: split Intel uncore driver to smaller
files
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:05:45PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On 07/28/2014 03:56 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 04:40:55PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> >> split Intel uncore driver into four files:
> >> - perf_event_intel_uncore.c: general functions of Intel uncore driver.
> >> - perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c: hardware specific code for
> >> Nehalem-EX/Westmere-EX
> >> - perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c: hardware specific code for
> >> Nehalem/SandBridge/Haswell
> >> - perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c: hardware specific code for
> >> SandyBridge-EP/IvyTown uncore
> >
> > Did not apply properly to tip/master, also can you do that in 3 patches?
> >
>
> the patch is based on tip/perf/core
Hmm, that should be good enough, didn't want to apply though, gave a
massive rej.
> > One breaking out the nhm/wsm-ex part, one breaking out the
> > nhm/wsm/snb/ivb/hsw bits, and one for the snb/ivb-ep bits?
> >
> will do
Thanks!
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists