lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:20:42 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <>
To:	Andreas Färber <>
Cc:	Mark Rutland <>,,
	Michal Simek <>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <>,
	Pawel Moll <>,
	Ian Campbell <>,
	Michal Simek <>,, Rob Herring <>,
	Matteo Vit <>,
	Sean Rickerd <>,
	Kumar Gala <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] Documentation: devicetree: Fix ADI AXI SPDIF

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:43:02PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 25.07.2014 12:39, schrieb Mark Brown:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:32:43PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:

> >> Maybe this works for you?
> >>

> >> Otherwise I can resend with Ab/Rb.

> > Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

> Not helpful here, nor is
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt. It's separate
> from code changes, sent via git-send-email, has a Sob, went to LKML and
> LAKML and DTML. I could add a Fixes: header and CC trivial for this
> one-line fix IIUC.

It's telling you that the kernel process is to review patches sent via
e-mail, not random links to web appliations - notice the context to
which I'm replying, I'm saying that sending a link to something on the
web isn't a good way of submitting a patch.

> Doesn't tell me which patches I should CC you on in the future though.
> Therefore my request to fix the false negative in MAINTAINERS so that me
> and other kernel newbies don't run into it again.

Feel free to submit patches if you want to see changes.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists