lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:28:12 +0200
From:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Matteo Vit <matteo.vit@...rwaredesign.com>,
	Sean Rickerd <srickerd@...e.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] Documentation: devicetree: Fix ADI AXI SPDIF
 specification

Am 28.07.2014 14:20, schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:43:02PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 25.07.2014 12:39, schrieb Mark Brown:
>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:32:43PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> 
>>>> Maybe this works for you?
>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4620191/
> 
>>>> Otherwise I can resend with Ab/Rb.
> 
>>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
> 
>> Not helpful here, nor is
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt. It's separate
>> from code changes, sent via git-send-email, has a Sob, went to LKML and
>> LAKML and DTML. I could add a Fixes: header and CC trivial for this
>> one-line fix IIUC.
> 
> It's telling you that the kernel process is to review patches sent via
> e-mail, not random links to web appliations - notice the context to
> which I'm replying, I'm saying that sending a link to something on the
> web isn't a good way of submitting a patch.
> 
>> Doesn't tell me which patches I should CC you on in the future though.
>> Therefore my request to fix the false negative in MAINTAINERS so that me
>> and other kernel newbies don't run into it again.
> 
> Feel free to submit patches if you want to see changes.

Dude, this patch *was* submitted and has been reviewed by two people.
Don't pretend I didn't follow the SubmittingPatches workflow.

The link I gave you contains an mbox-format link that can be used with
wget and git-am to *apply* the patch if you apparently missed it on the
mailing lists.

I will *re*-submit it for your convenience.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ