[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140728190009.GB3769@osiris>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:00:09 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, linux390@...ibm.com,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: char: sclp_async.c: Cleaning up missing
null-terminate in conjunction with strncpy
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Replacing strncpy with strlcpy to avoid strings that lacks null terminate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
> ---
> drivers/s390/char/sclp_async.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_async.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_async.c
> index 5f9f929..585de0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_async.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_async.c
> @@ -132,12 +132,12 @@ static int sclp_async_send_wait(char *message)
> request->command = SCLP_CMDW_WRITE_EVENT_DATA;
> request->sccb = sccb;
> request->status = SCLP_REQ_FILLED;
> - strncpy(sccb->evbuf.data, message, sizeof(sccb->evbuf.data));
> + strlcpy(sccb->evbuf.data, message, sizeof(sccb->evbuf.data));
Do your patches actually fix any bugs? E.g. this line fills a hardware data
structure, which must not necessarily be null terminated. Actually you even
could have introduced a bug here.
So, please state which of your patches actually do fix bugs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists