[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y4vbhhg2.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:29:49 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>,
Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/27] perf tools: Enable --children option by default
Hi Andres,
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:45:48 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-07-29 15:52:46 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:23:26 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > On 2014-05-29 12:58:25 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> >> Now perf top and perf report will show children column by default if
>> >> it has callchain information.
>> >>
>> >> Requested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>> >> Tested-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>
>> >> Tested-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
>> >> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>> >> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>> >
>> > Stupid question: Why? This breaks user's usage pattern in a rather
>> > significant way because the new output is pretty much entirely useless
>> > in many cases, especially for userland programs. I think the new option
>> > is great, but why is it suddenly the default?
>>
>> Yes, I knew it'd annoy some existing users like you :) But I hoped it'd
>> be useful for new and (at least, some of) old users to see children/
>> cumulative overheads by default. If it lies under an option, it
>> wouldn't have a chance to be used by normal users who simply run perf
>> record and report most of time.
>
> By that argument every new feature would need to be enabled by
> default. Which normally isn't what happens.
Yes, I know and that's what we usually do. What I wanted to say was
it's a special case. :)
>
>> If you think it's entirely useless for you cases, you can set it to off
>> using ~/.perfconfig file:
>>
>> [report]
>> children = false
>
> Already done that ;).
Good. :)
>
> The problem is still that I can't use --no-children on older systems, so
> I can't write benchmarking scripts anymore that don't take depend on the
> perf version...
Hmm.. I don't understand what's your problem. If you set the config
option you don't need to use --no-children at all and it'd work in a
same way for old and new versions, no?
>
> I guess it's too late to argue effectively though :)
Well, I think it can be changed later, if enough number of users yell at
me - now I have two. :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists