lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140729215432.4B73FC40738@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:54:32 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Nishanth Peethambaran <nishanth.p@...il.com>,
	Marc <marc.ceeeee@...il.com>,
	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V." <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 3/4] drivers: dma-coherent: add initialization
 from device tree

On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:28:06 +0200, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> Initialization procedure of dma coherent pool has been split into two
> parts, so memory pool can now be initialized without assigning to
> particular struct device. Then initialized region can be assigned to
> more than one struct device. To protect from concurent allocations from
> different devices, a spinlock has been added to dma_coherent_mem
> structure. The last part of this patch adds support for handling
> 'shared-dma-pool' reserved-memory device tree nodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>

I think this looks okay. It isn't in my area of expertise though.
Comments below.

> ---
>  drivers/base/dma-coherent.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c b/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
> index 7d6e84a51424..7185a4f247e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
> @@ -14,11 +14,14 @@ struct dma_coherent_mem {
>  	int		size;
>  	int		flags;
>  	unsigned long	*bitmap;
> +	spinlock_t	spinlock;
>  };
>  
> -int dma_declare_coherent_memory(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys_addr,
> -				dma_addr_t device_addr, size_t size, int flags)
> +static int dma_init_coherent_memory(phys_addr_t phys_addr, dma_addr_t device_addr,
> +			     size_t size, int flags,
> +			     struct dma_coherent_mem **mem)

This is a bit odd. Why wouldn't you return the dma_mem pointer directly
instead of passing in a **mem argument?

>  {
> +	struct dma_coherent_mem *dma_mem = NULL;
>  	void __iomem *mem_base = NULL;
>  	int pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(pages) * sizeof(long);
> @@ -27,27 +30,26 @@ int dma_declare_coherent_memory(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys_addr,
>  		goto out;
>  	if (!size)
>  		goto out;
> -	if (dev->dma_mem)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	/* FIXME: this routine just ignores DMA_MEMORY_INCLUDES_CHILDREN */
>  
>  	mem_base = ioremap(phys_addr, size);
>  	if (!mem_base)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	dev->dma_mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct dma_coherent_mem), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!dev->dma_mem)
> +	dma_mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct dma_coherent_mem), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!dma_mem)
>  		goto out;
> -	dev->dma_mem->bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!dev->dma_mem->bitmap)
> +	dma_mem->bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!dma_mem->bitmap)
>  		goto free1_out;
>  
> -	dev->dma_mem->virt_base = mem_base;
> -	dev->dma_mem->device_base = device_addr;
> -	dev->dma_mem->pfn_base = PFN_DOWN(phys_addr);
> -	dev->dma_mem->size = pages;
> -	dev->dma_mem->flags = flags;
> +	dma_mem->virt_base = mem_base;
> +	dma_mem->device_base = device_addr;
> +	dma_mem->pfn_base = PFN_DOWN(phys_addr);
> +	dma_mem->size = pages;
> +	dma_mem->flags = flags;
> +	spin_lock_init(&dma_mem->spinlock);
> +
> +	*mem = dma_mem;
>  
>  	if (flags & DMA_MEMORY_MAP)
>  		return DMA_MEMORY_MAP;
> @@ -55,12 +57,51 @@ int dma_declare_coherent_memory(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys_addr,
>  	return DMA_MEMORY_IO;
>  
>   free1_out:
> -	kfree(dev->dma_mem);
> +	kfree(dma_mem);
>   out:
>  	if (mem_base)
>  		iounmap(mem_base);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +static void dma_release_coherent_memory(struct dma_coherent_mem *mem)
> +{
> +	if (!mem)
> +		return;
> +	iounmap(mem->virt_base);
> +	kfree(mem->bitmap);
> +	kfree(mem);
> +}
> +
> +static int dma_assign_coherent_memory(struct device *dev,
> +				      struct dma_coherent_mem *mem)
> +{
> +	if (dev->dma_mem)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	dev->dma_mem = mem;
> +	/* FIXME: this routine just ignores DMA_MEMORY_INCLUDES_CHILDREN */
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int dma_declare_coherent_memory(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys_addr,
> +				dma_addr_t device_addr, size_t size, int flags)
> +{
> +	struct dma_coherent_mem *mem;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = dma_init_coherent_memory(phys_addr, device_addr, size, flags,
> +				       &mem);
> +	if (ret == 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (dma_assign_coherent_memory(dev, mem) == 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	dma_release_coherent_memory(mem);
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_declare_coherent_memory);
>  
>  void dma_release_declared_memory(struct device *dev)
> @@ -69,10 +110,8 @@ void dma_release_declared_memory(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	if (!mem)
>  		return;
> +	dma_release_coherent_memory(mem);
>  	dev->dma_mem = NULL;
> -	iounmap(mem->virt_base);
> -	kfree(mem->bitmap);
> -	kfree(mem);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_release_declared_memory);
>  
> @@ -80,6 +119,7 @@ void *dma_mark_declared_memory_occupied(struct device *dev,
>  					dma_addr_t device_addr, size_t size)
>  {
>  	struct dma_coherent_mem *mem = dev->dma_mem;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	int pos, err;
>  
>  	size += device_addr & ~PAGE_MASK;
> @@ -87,8 +127,11 @@ void *dma_mark_declared_memory_occupied(struct device *dev,
>  	if (!mem)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mem->spinlock, flags);
>  	pos = (device_addr - mem->device_base) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	err = bitmap_allocate_region(mem->bitmap, pos, get_order(size));
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->spinlock, flags);
> +
>  	if (err != 0)
>  		return ERR_PTR(err);
>  	return mem->virt_base + (pos << PAGE_SHIFT);
> @@ -115,6 +158,7 @@ int dma_alloc_from_coherent(struct device *dev, ssize_t size,
>  {
>  	struct dma_coherent_mem *mem;
>  	int order = get_order(size);
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	int pageno;
>  
>  	if (!dev)
> @@ -124,6 +168,7 @@ int dma_alloc_from_coherent(struct device *dev, ssize_t size,
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	*ret = NULL;
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mem->spinlock, flags);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(size > (mem->size << PAGE_SHIFT)))
>  		goto err;
> @@ -138,10 +183,12 @@ int dma_alloc_from_coherent(struct device *dev, ssize_t size,
>  	*dma_handle = mem->device_base + (pageno << PAGE_SHIFT);
>  	*ret = mem->virt_base + (pageno << PAGE_SHIFT);
>  	memset(*ret, 0, size);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->spinlock, flags);
>  
>  	return 1;
>  
>  err:
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->spinlock, flags);
>  	/*
>  	 * In the case where the allocation can not be satisfied from the
>  	 * per-device area, try to fall back to generic memory if the
> @@ -171,8 +218,11 @@ int dma_release_from_coherent(struct device *dev, int order, void *vaddr)
>  	if (mem && vaddr >= mem->virt_base && vaddr <
>  		   (mem->virt_base + (mem->size << PAGE_SHIFT))) {
>  		int page = (vaddr - mem->virt_base) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		unsigned long flags;
>  
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&mem->spinlock, flags);
>  		bitmap_release_region(mem->bitmap, page, order);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->spinlock, flags);
>  		return 1;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> @@ -218,3 +268,52 @@ int dma_mmap_from_coherent(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_mmap_from_coherent);
> +
> +/*
> + * Support for reserved memory regions defined in device tree
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_RESERVED_MEM
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> +
> +static void rmem_dma_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem, struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct dma_coherent_mem *mem = rmem->priv;

Will the reserved_mem->priv pointer ever point to some other kind of
structure? How do we know that the pointer here is always a
dma_coherent_mem struct (if there are other uses of priv, what is the
guarantee against another user assigning something to it?) Is it the
reserved_mem_ops below that provide the guarantee?

If it is a risk, then the alternative would be to put an explicit
dma_coherent_mem pointer into the reserved_mem structure.

> +	if (!mem &&
> +	    dma_init_coherent_memory(rmem->base, rmem->base, rmem->size,
> +				     DMA_MEMORY_MAP | DMA_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE,
> +				     &mem) != DMA_MEMORY_MAP) {
> +		pr_info("Reserved memory: failed to init DMA memory pool at %pa, size %ld MiB\n",
> +			&rmem->base, (unsigned long)rmem->size / SZ_1M);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	rmem->priv = mem;
> +	dma_assign_coherent_memory(dev, mem);
> +}
> +
> +static void rmem_dma_device_release(struct reserved_mem *rmem,
> +				    struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	dev->dma_mem = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct reserved_mem_ops rmem_dma_ops = {
> +	.device_init	= rmem_dma_device_init,
> +	.device_release	= rmem_dma_device_release,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init rmem_dma_setup(struct reserved_mem *rmem)
> +{
> +	unsigned long node = rmem->fdt_node;
> +
> +	if (of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reusable", NULL))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	rmem->ops = &rmem_dma_ops;
> +	pr_info("Reserved memory: created DMA memory pool at %pa, size %ld MiB\n",
> +		&rmem->base, (unsigned long)rmem->size / SZ_1M);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +RESERVEDMEM_OF_DECLARE(dma, "shared-dma-pool", rmem_dma_setup);
> +#endif
> -- 
> 1.9.2
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ