[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53D89639.5080405@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:52:41 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
<dipankar@...ibm.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, <josh@...htriplett.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <dhowells@...hat.com>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
<fweisbec@...il.com>, <oleg@...hat.com>, <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks()
On 07/29/2014 06:56 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> + /*
> + * Each pass through the following loop scans the list
> + * of holdout tasks, removing any that are no longer
> + * holdouts. When the list is empty, we are done.
> + */
> + while (!list_empty(&rcu_tasks_holdouts)) {
> + schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ / 10);
> + flush_signals(current);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &rcu_tasks_holdouts,
> + rcu_tasks_holdout_list) {
> + if (smp_load_acquire(&t->rcu_tasks_holdout))
> + continue;
> + list_del_init(&t->rcu_tasks_holdout_list);
> + /* @@@ need to check for usermode on CPU. */
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
Maybe I missed something. The task @t may already exited and we access to
the stale memory here if without patch 8/9.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists