[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140730221819.GB18189@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:18:19 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>
Cc: Bob Beck <beck@...nbsd.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Theo de Raadt <deraadt@....openbsd.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4] random: introduce getrandom(2) system call
On Wed 2014-07-30 16:40:52, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Mit, 2014-07-30 at 07:56 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> > Pavel. I have bit 'ol enterprise daemon running with established file
> > descriptors serving thousands of connections
> > which periodically require entropy. Now I run out of descriptors. I
> > can't establish new connections. but I should
> > now halt all the other ones that require entropy? I should raise
> > SIGKILL on my process serving these thousands
> > of connetions? I don't think so.
>
> If that long-running daemon periodically needs something from a device,
> one would better keep the fd for that open the whole time. Saves some
> CPU cycles and latency too BTW.
Agreed.
On the other hand, keeping a fd open is quite tricky for a
library. But better solution might be to make that easier.
open( , O_IM_A_LIBRARY_GIVE_ME_ONE_OF_THREE_RESERVED_FDS) might be one
solution. Actually, one reserved fd should be enough.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists