[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1406731254.26034.4.camel@thorin>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:40:52 +0200
From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>
To: Bob Beck <beck@...nbsd.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Theo de Raadt <deraadt@....openbsd.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4] random: introduce getrandom(2) system call
On Mit, 2014-07-30 at 07:56 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> Pavel. I have bit 'ol enterprise daemon running with established file
> descriptors serving thousands of connections
> which periodically require entropy. Now I run out of descriptors. I
> can't establish new connections. but I should
> now halt all the other ones that require entropy? I should raise
> SIGKILL on my process serving these thousands
> of connetions? I don't think so.
If that long-running daemon periodically needs something from a device,
one would better keep the fd for that open the whole time. Saves some
CPU cycles and latency too BTW.
Bernd
--
"I dislike type abstraction if it has no real reason. And saving
on typing is not a good reason - if your typing speed is the main
issue when you're coding, you're doing something seriously wrong."
- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists