[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1407165075.16152.70.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 08:11:15 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Dotan Barak <dotanb@...lanox.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: checkpatch.pl report about "Missing blank line after
declarations" in a structure definition
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 14:50 +0000, Dotan Barak wrote:
> I think that allowing a prefix is reasonable (to allow modules to add more flexibility).
> I tried the suggested change and it still didn't work for me.
>
> The following change worked for me:
> (?:$Storage\s+)?[A-Z0-9_]*(?:DECLARE|DEFINE)_[A-Z_]*\s*\(|
>
> But, maybe it is better to be even more general and allow:
> (?:$Storage\s+)?[A-Z0-9_]*(?:DECLARE|DEFINE)_[ A-Z0-9_]*\s*\(|
Maybe:
(?:$Storage\s+)(?:[A-Z_][A-Z0-9]+_){0,2}(?:DEFINE|DECLARE)(?:_[A-Z0-9]+){1,2}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists