linux-kernel - RE: checkpatch.pl report about "Missing blank line after declarations" in a structure definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3b44a1bc344f40feb7c8119a4b102494@DB3PR05MB380.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2014 15:19:58 +0000
From:	Dotan Barak <dotanb@...lanox.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: checkpatch.pl report about "Missing blank line after
 declarations" in a structure definition

In our code (I take it as an example), we used  MLX5_DECLARE_DOORBELL_LOCK,
So I guess that the regular expression that you mentioned will fail on it
(because the "_" is not allowed to be repeated).

So, I would change it a little bit to allow people to use underscore as a word separator.

Thanks
Dotan

> >
> > The following change worked for me:
> > (?:$Storage\s+)?[A-Z0-9_]*(?:DECLARE|DEFINE)_[A-Z_]*\s*\(|
> >
> > But, maybe it is better to be even more general and allow:
> > (?:$Storage\s+)?[A-Z0-9_]*(?:DECLARE|DEFINE)_[ A-Z0-9_]*\s*\(|
> 
> Maybe:
> 
> (?:$Storage\s+)(?:[A-Z_][A-Z0-9]+_){0,2}(?:DEFINE|DECLARE)(?:_[A-Z0-
> 9]+){1,2}
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/