[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140805233507.GA27293@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:35:07 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dzonatans Melgalvis <dz.melgalvis@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: comedi: comedidev.h: fix checkpatch code style
issue
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:29:45AM +0300, Dzonatans Melgalvis wrote:
> Fixing checkpatch warning - blank line missing after declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dzonatans Melgalvis <dz.melgalvis@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/comedi/comedidev.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/comedidev.h b/drivers/staging/comedi/comedidev.h
> index 58e58a3..c9b7978 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/comedidev.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/comedidev.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct comedi_subdevice {
> const unsigned int *maxdata_list; /* list is channel specific */
>
> const struct comedi_lrange *range_table;
> +
> const struct comedi_lrange *const *range_table_list;
Really? Why add that one? Shouldn't you just remove the previous line?
>
> unsigned int *chanlist; /* driver-owned chanlist (not used) */
> @@ -207,8 +208,10 @@ struct comedi_async {
> struct comedi_cmd cmd;
> wait_queue_head_t wait_head;
> unsigned int cb_mask;
> +
> int (*inttrig)(struct comedi_device *dev, struct comedi_subdevice *s,
> unsigned int x);
> +
> };
Why is that last line needed?
Please use your judgement with checkpatch fixes, this patch isn't ok
as-is, sorry.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists