[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140806102641.GB10136@lee--X1>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:26:41 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, "Gupta, Pekon\"" <pekon@...com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: stm_nand_bch: add new driver
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:20:05AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
[...]
> > + if (((unsigned int)buf & (NANDI_BCH_DMA_ALIGNMENT - 1)) ||
> > + (!virt_addr_valid(buf))) /* vmalloc'd buffer! */
> > + bounce = true;
> > +
> > + p = bounce ? nandi->page_buf : buf;
>
> It looks like you're reimplementing NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER. Can you try
> using that flag? (You may need to extend it to account for your DMA
> alignment, too.)
NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER won't work for us unless we can guarantee that
the bounce buffer will always be 64 Byte aligned, which I don't think
we can. Another way to do it would be to assign all of our own
buffers, but I'm really not comfortable fiddling with those as there
are a lot of controller specific intricacies which a) I'm not familiar
with and b) no longer have Angus to fire questions off to and/or
review.
So if you don't mind, I'd really rather use Angus' implementation.
It's only an extra couple of lines and Angus has already tested it to
a high level.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists