[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140806110748.GC27033@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:07:48 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, toshi.kani@...com, imammedo@...hat.com,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com, mingo@...nel.org, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
prarit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Brandt, Todd E" <todd.e.brandt@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86/CPU: Avoid 100ms sleep for cpu offline during S3
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 05:29:18PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> I think you can pull Tod's tool from git hub and do test from your
> laptop. I attached a configure file come from ubuntu which is easier
> to produce the issue. You can use it to reproduce the issue.
Right, so I ran it on an old dualcore AMD laptop I have lying around
here and it didn't show any difference with or without your patch.
For all 4 runs I did with the tool running it without any arguments (so
it did the default thing), I got suspend time for CPU1 of 4-6 msec and
resume of ~20msec.
I don't know whether it is the dual core or AMD but your patch doesn't
change anything on that laptop which is ok, I'd guess.
> Ok. BTW, I have tested it on the Ivbridge and Haswell machines.
Yeah, add those numbers to the commit message too.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists