linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/94] 3.2.62-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:25:19 +0900
From:	Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/94] 3.2.62-rc1 review

At Mon, 4 Aug 2014 10:55:44 -0700,
Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:48:31PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.62 release.
> > There are 94 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed Aug 06 17:00:00 UTC 2014.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> Build results:
> 	total: 111 pass: 105 fail: 6
> Failed builds:
> 	microblaze:mmu_defconfig
> 	microblaze:nommu_defconfig
> 	mips:allmodconfig
> 	sparc64:allmodconfig
> 	xtensa:defconfig
> 	xtensa:allmodconfig
> 
> Qemu tests all passed.
> 
> This is a significant improvement over the previous versions, where we used
> to see up to 10 build failures. The previously failing builds for unicore32
> and score now pass, as well as alpha:allmodconfig.
> 
> Note that I rearranged arm builds to improve test coverage.
> 
> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
> 
> Guenter

This kernel passed my test.

 - Test Cases:
   - Build this kernel.
   - Boot this kernel.
   - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.

 - Test Tool:
   https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable

 - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
   http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/<version>-<test datetime>.tar.xz

 - Build Environment:
   - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
   - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
   - memory: 8GB

 - Test Target Environment:
   - Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment)
   - # of vCPU: 2
   - memory: 2GB

Thanks,
Satoru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/