linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/94] 3.2.62-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1407344808.8341.45.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 06 Aug 2014 18:06:48 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/94] 3.2.62-rc1 review

On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 22:25 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> At Mon, 4 Aug 2014 10:55:44 -0700,
> Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:48:31PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.62 release.
> > > There are 94 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Wed Aug 06 17:00:00 UTC 2014.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > Build results:
> > 	total: 111 pass: 105 fail: 6
> > Failed builds:
> > 	microblaze:mmu_defconfig
> > 	microblaze:nommu_defconfig
> > 	mips:allmodconfig
> > 	sparc64:allmodconfig
> > 	xtensa:defconfig
> > 	xtensa:allmodconfig
> > 
> > Qemu tests all passed.
> > 
> > This is a significant improvement over the previous versions, where we used
> > to see up to 10 build failures. The previously failing builds for unicore32
> > and score now pass, as well as alpha:allmodconfig.
> > 
> > Note that I rearranged arm builds to improve test coverage.
> > 
> > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
> > 
> > Guenter
> 
> This kernel passed my test.

Thanks for testing!

Ben.

>  - Test Cases:
>    - Build this kernel.
>    - Boot this kernel.
>    - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
> 
>  - Test Tool:
>    https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
> 
>  - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
>    http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/<version>-<test datetime>.tar.xz
> 
>  - Build Environment:
>    - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
>    - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
>    - memory: 8GB
> 
>  - Test Target Environment:
>    - Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment)
>    - # of vCPU: 2
>    - memory: 2GB
> 
> Thanks,
> Satoru

-- 
Ben Hutchings
To err is human; to really foul things up requires a computer.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)