linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: devtest - new make target for build all and run tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140806143149.GA13552@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2014 07:31:49 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc:	shuah.kh@...sung.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: devtest - new make target for build all and run
 tests

On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 04:06:33PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2014-08-06 16:04, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 08/06/2014 07:51 AM, Michal Marek wrote:
> >> On 2014-07-18 22:44, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >>> Add a new devtest make target to enable developer testing. This
> >>> new target does full build (make all) and then runs selftests.
> >>
> >> I agree with Sam that the name is rather ambiguous, but I can't suggest
> >> a better alternative right now.
> > 
> > Does kselftest or kern_selftest sound better?
> 
> It does sound better to me than dev(ice)test, but I'm not a native
> English speaker. Greg?

Either is fine with me, but I don't think we have '_' as any make target
today, so perhaps "kselftest" is best?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/