[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcMhh4iajPXrWZ3wDZwsu-twaZOoao3GRGDPBj0tdMMxhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 11:54:01 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2014 7:36 PM, "Denys Vlasenko" <vda.linux@...glemail.com> wrote:
>> Then old_rsp can be nuked everywhere else,
>> RESTORE_TOP_OF_STACK can be nuked, and
>> FIXUP_TOP_OF_STACK can be reduced to merely:
>>
>> movq $__USER_DS,SS(%rsp)
>> movq $__USER_CS,CS(%rsp)
>
> Mmm, right. That's probably better than doing this on the fast path.
I measured it. These particular insns have a nasty huge encoding in x86 -
12 bytes each, no less!
48 c7 84 24 88 00 00 00 33 00 00 00 movq $0x33,0x88(%rsp)
48 c7 84 24 a0 00 00 00 2b 00 00 00 movq $0x2b,0xa0(%rsp)
With them in hot path, I measure 55.6 ns per syscall,
with them moved out of hot path it's 54.8 ns.
This is 2.70GHz CPU, so it must be 2 CPU cycles.
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists