linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - Fix double free of input device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140807165545.GB22421@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date:	Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:55:45 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk
Cc:	Yufeng Shen <miletus@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
	Alan Bowens <Alan.Bowens@...el.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - Fix double free of input device

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:07:17PM +0100, nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> index 03b8571..da497db 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> @@ -1353,8 +1353,10 @@ static int mxt_get_info(struct mxt_data *data)
>  
>  static void mxt_free_object_table(struct mxt_data *data)
>  {
> -	input_unregister_device(data->input_dev);
> -	data->input_dev = NULL;
> +	if (data->input_dev) {
> +		input_unregister_device(data->input_dev);
> +		data->input_dev = NULL;
> +	}
>  
>  	kfree(data->object_table);
>  	data->object_table = NULL;
> @@ -2194,7 +2196,6 @@ static int mxt_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  
>  	sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &mxt_attr_group);
>  	free_irq(data->irq, data);
> -	input_unregister_device(data->input_dev);
>  	mxt_free_object_table(data);
>  	kfree(data);

No. Let's have mxt_free_object_table() only free object table, and let's
call input_unregister_device() explicitly where needed, like we do in
mxt_remove().

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/