[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140809132544.GA8981@dragon>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 21:25:47 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: "edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>
CC: Anson Huang <b20788@...escale.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] Thermal: imx: add i.mx6sx thermal support
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 08:15:54AM -0400, edubezval@...il.com wrote:
> Hello Shawn,
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 03:12:09PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> >> i.MX6SX has some new features of thermal interrupt function,
> >> there are LOW, HIGH and PANIC irq for thermal sensor, so add
> >> platform data to separate different thermal version;
> >>
> >> The reset value of LOW ALARM is 0 which means the highest
> >> temp, so the LOW ALARM will be triggered once irq is enabled,
> >> so we need to correct it before enabling thermal irq;
> >>
> >> Enable PANIC ALARM as critical trip point, it will trigger
> >> system reset via SRC module once PANIC IRQ is triggered, it
> >> is pure hardware function, so use it instead of software
> >> reset by cooling device.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <b20788@...escale.com>
> >
> > Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Did you have the chance to test on both? i.MX6Q and i.MX6SX?
Yes, I did test on both i.MX6Q and i.MX6SX.
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists