linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140809180455.GA4120@two.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Sat, 9 Aug 2014 20:04:55 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc:	Sergey Oboguev <oboguev.public@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	khalid.aziz@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio)

> NAK.  There it is, my imaginary NAK to imaginary realtime priorities :)

Ok, but do you have any alternative proposal yourself how to solve the
lockholder preemption problem? I assume you agree it's a real problem.

Just being negative is not very constructive.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/